pour le 15 juin 2021. <\/strong>Les participant.e.s retenu.e.s seront notifie\u0301.e.s le 30 juin.<\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong>Papers may be given via videoconference if delegates cannot physically attend or if the conference cannot be held onsite due to sanitary circumstances.<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong>(scroll down for English version<\/em>)<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong>Le territoire a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un renouvellement th\u00e9orique sous l\u2019impulsion de Stuart Elden (The Birth of Territory<\/em>, 2013). Dans sa lecture de Shakespeare, Elden explique que \u00ab\u00a0le territoire n\u2019est pas un produit, mais un processus\u00a0\u00bb. De m\u00eame, la diplomatie n\u2019est plus envisag\u00e9e comme pur \u00e9v\u00e9nement mais comme processus. Ce colloque interrogera l\u2019interaction entre territoire et diplomatie aux XVIIe<\/sup> et XVIIIe<\/sup> si\u00e8cles dans le monde anglo-am\u00e9ricain et ses relations ext\u00e9rieures \u00e0 l\u2019aune de ces changements th\u00e9oriques. Territoire et diplomatie seront envisag\u00e9s comme mots, concepts et pratiques. Les approches sollicit\u00e9es sont celles de l\u2019histoire (diplomatique, politique, \u00e9conomique et sociale), de la litt\u00e9rature, de la philosophie, du droit, ainsi que celle de la nouvelle histoire diplomatique (croisant litt\u00e9rature, histoire et philosophie). Les communications en anglais ou en fran\u00e7ais (25-30 minutes) porteront sur le monde anglo-am\u00e9ricain ou d\u2019autres aires g\u00e9ographiques dans une perspective comparatiste avec la sph\u00e8re anglophone des XVIIe<\/sup> et XVIIIe<\/sup> si\u00e8cles.<\/p>\n\u00c0 la lumi\u00e8re du De iure belli ac pacis<\/em> de Grotius et sa D\u00e9fense du chapitre V de<\/em> Mare Liberum<\/em> (r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la traduction du De iure <\/em>de 1609 par Hakluyt), nous envisagerons le territoire de la diplomatie en termes de porosit\u00e9 et de processus. Nous reviendrons sur la souverainet\u00e9 territoriale, le d\u00e9tachement entre la persona<\/em> du monarque et le territoire, et leur impact dans la repr\u00e9sentation et l\u2019action diplomatiques. \u00c0 l\u2019aune de la nature changeante des r\u00e9sidences diplomatiques britanniques \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger et aussi en fonction des cessions et acquisitions de territoires aux Am\u00e9riques, en Afrique et en Asie, on observera l\u2019impact de l\u2019ambassade (comme activit\u00e9 et comme lieu) dans la reconnaissance d\u2019une souverainet\u00e9. Les communications pourront aussi \u00e9valuer les effets des r\u00e9volutions anglaises et am\u00e9ricaine sur la conception et l\u2019utilisation du territoire diplomatique. Ceci soul\u00e8vera une r\u00e9flexion sur les concepts d\u2019extraterritorialit\u00e9, d\u2019inviolabilit\u00e9 et sur l\u2019existence de territoires-sanctuaires. Il s\u2019agira donc d\u2019ouvrir la r\u00e9flexion sur la cr\u00e9ation de territoires de diplomatie, notamment gr\u00e2ce au commerce. On interrogera l\u2019influence des routes et pratiques commerciales intra et extra-europ\u00e9ennes sur les pratiques diplomatiques et la conception du territoire.<\/p>\nLe territoire de diplomatie se posera aussi en termes de cr\u00e9ation litt\u00e9raire, artistique et spectaculaire. On pourra interroger le r\u00f4le des artistes (itin\u00e9rants) comme cr\u00e9ateurs de territoires, des lieux de culture comme territoires de diplomatie tant du point de vue des b\u00e2timents que de leur fr\u00e9quentation ou de leur programmation. Comme dans les travaux de Lotte Jensen sur les traductions anglaises de po\u00e8mes \u00e9trangers comme acte de diplomatie internationale aux XVIIe<\/sup> et XVIIIe<\/sup> si\u00e8cles, on consid\u00e9rera les tropes de la diplomatie et du territoire dans la po\u00e9sie mais aussi le roman, la litt\u00e9rature \u00e9pistolaire (The Turkish Embassy Letters<\/em> (1762) de Lady Mary Wortley Montagu) et la traduction d\u2019\u0153uvres litt\u00e9raires en ou depuis l\u2019anglais. \u00c0 l\u2019aune des r\u00e9cents travaux sur le th\u00e9\u00e2tre et la diplomatie culturelle depuis Shakespeare et la recr\u00e9ation de ses \u0153uvres (\u00e0 la Restauration et au XVIIIe<\/sup> si\u00e8cle) jusqu\u2019aux pi\u00e8ces d\u2019Aphra Behn ou de Susana Centlivre, le colloque sollicite des propositions sur l\u2019\u00e9criture dramatique et dramaturgique du territoire diplomatique. Comme Ellen Welch dans Theatre of Diplomacy <\/em>(2017), on observera comment se cr\u00e9e un territoire diplomatique lors d\u2019une rencontre officielle via l\u2019art th\u00e9\u00e2tral, musical, pictural et la fiction, mais aussi comment les objets d\u2019art ou litt\u00e9raires sont porteurs de territoires.<\/p>\nAu XVIIe<\/sup> si\u00e8cle, le mot \u00ab\u00a0territoire\u00a0\u00bb change de sens en anglais et signifie une \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9gion, ou la campagne qui se situe aux alentours de la ville\u00a0\u00bb (Cawdrey, 1604). On pourra donc envisager une approche linguistique et lexicale de la question du territoire diplomatique. Par ailleurs, cette nouvelle d\u00e9finition soul\u00e8vera la question de l\u2019existence ou des pr\u00e9misses d\u2019une diplomatie territoriale (celle des villes, des territoires colonis\u00e9s). Enfin, il s\u2019agira aussi d\u2019envisager les limites du concept de territoire, comment du territoire on passe \u00e0 la territorialisation et en quoi cela constitue un obstacle \u00e0 la fois pratique et \u00e9pist\u00e9mique. On r\u00e9fl\u00e9chira au concept de territoire dans les pratiques de diplomatie interculturelle et de diplomatie fond\u00e9e sur le trait\u00e9 (aux Am\u00e9riques notamment) en contraste avec l\u2019emploi d\u2019une diplomatie militaire.<\/p>\nEnglish\u00a0 version<\/strong><\/p>\nIn The Birth of Territory<\/em> (2013), Stuart Elden reenvisaged the theoretical and practical approaches to the concept of territory. In his analysis of Shakespeare\u2019s plays, Elden explains that \u201cterritory is not a product, but a process.\u201d Likewise, diplomacy is not viewed as a series of events but as a process. Considering these fundamental theoretical evolutions, this conference seeks to analyse the relationship between territory and diplomacy in the 17th<\/sup> and 18th<\/sup> centuries in the Anglo-American world and its international relations. Territory and diplomacy will be examined as words, concepts and practice. The methodological approaches to be used will be those of history (diplomatic, political, economic and social), literature, philosophy, law and the new diplomatic history which articulates literature, history and philosophy. Papers (25-30 minutes) will be given in English or French. They will deal with the Anglo-American world or other geographical areas but in connection with the anglophone sphere of the 17th<\/sup> and 18th<\/sup> centuries.<\/p>\nIn the wake of Grotius\u2019 discussion of sovereignty in De iure belli ac pacis<\/em>, and of territory and the ambassador in Defense chapter V of Mare Liberum<\/em> (his answer to Richard Hakluyt\u2019s 1609 translation of De iure<\/em>), the territories of diplomacy will be analysed in terms of porosity and process. The conference will reappraise territorial sovereignty, the rupture between the monarch\u2019s persona<\/em> and the territory, and their impact on diplomatic representation and action. It will observe the impact of embassy (as both a place and a trade) on the recognition of sovereignty especially in the context of the evolution of ambassadorial residences and the sale and purchase of territories in the Americas, Africa and Asia. Papers may also assess the impact of the English and American revolutions on the concept and use of diplomatic territory. They will raise the issues of extraterritoriality, inviolability and the existence of sanctuary territories. The conference will thus seek to reflect on the creation of territories of diplomacy through commerce and question the influence of intra and extra European commercial roads and practices on the practice of diplomacy and the concept of territory.<\/p>\nTerritories of diplomacy and their creation will also be considered in terms of literary, artistic and dramatic creation. Proposals may question the role of (itinerant) artists as creators of territories, the role of cultural spaces as territories of diplomacy (whether we focus on locations, audiences or types of entertainment). In the wake of Lotte Jensen\u2019s work on English translations of foreign poems as gestures of international diplomacy in the 17th<\/sup> and 18th <\/sup>centuries, the conference seeks to observe the tropes of diplomacy and territory in poetry, novels, epistolary literature (e.g. Lady Montagu\u2019s Turkish Embassy Letters <\/em>(1762)) and in the translation from or into English of literary works. In the wake of the recent research on theatre and cultural diplomacy from Shakespeare\u2019s works and their subsequent recreation to Aphra Behn\u2019s or Susana Centlivre\u2019s plays, the conference seeks proposals on the dramatic writing and dramaturgical creation of diplomatic territories. Like Ellen Welch in Theatre of Diplomacy <\/em>(2017), papers may observe how drama, painting, music and fiction partake of the creation of diplomatic territories in official and unofficial encounters. Papers may also focus on literary and art objects as creators and ambassadors of a territory.<\/p>\nAt the turn of the 17th<\/sup> century, the meaning of the word \u2018territory\u2019 evolved to mean \u201cterritorie [\u2026] region, or the countrie lying about the citie\u201d (Cawdrey, 1604). The conference thus seeks linguistic and lexical analyses of the concept of diplomatic territory. Besides, this changing definition which now focuses on the urban level raises the issue of the existence or the premises of a territorial diplomacy (that of cities or colonised territories) in the 17th<\/sup> and 18th<\/sup> centuries. Finally, the conference welcomes proposals considering the limits of the concept of territory and how moving from territory to territorialisation can be both a practical and an epistemic obstacle. An example of this would be the study of the concept of territory in intercultural diplomacy and treaty diplomacy (notably in the Americas) in contrast with the increasing use of military diplomacy at that time.<\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nSelective bibliography \/ bibliographie s\u00e9lective.<\/strong><\/p>\nB\u00e9ly, Lucien. L’art de la paix en Europe. Naissance de la diplomatie moderne, XVIe-XVIIIe<\/em> (Paris\u00a0: PUF, 2007)<\/p>\n—————-. Espions et ambassadeurs\u00a0au temps de Louis XIV<\/em> (Paris\u00a0: PUF, 1990)<\/p>\nB\u00e9ly, Lucien, Hanotin, Guillaume, et Poumar\u00e8de G\u00e9raud, La Diplomatie-monde. Autour de la paix d’Utrecht \u2013 1713<\/em> (Paris\u00a0: Pedone, 2019)<\/p>\nBlack, Jeremy. British Diplomats and Diplomacy 1688-1800<\/em> (Liverpool University Press, 2001)<\/p>\nElden, Stuart. The Birth of Territory<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)<\/p>\n—————-. Shakespearean Territories<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018)<\/p>\nHampton Timothy, Fictions of Embassy: Literature and Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe <\/em>(Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2009)<\/p>\nMcConnell, Fiona. \u201cRethinking the Geographies of Diplomacy\u201d, Diplomatica<\/em>, Volume 1: Issue 1, Brill, 2019, Pages: 46\u201355, DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/25891774-00101008<\/a><\/p>\nMori Jennifer, The Culture of Diplomacy: Britain in Europe 1750-1830<\/em> (Toronto: Toronto UP, 2011)<\/p>\nNetzloff, Mark, Agents beyond the State. The Writings of English Travelers, Soldiers, and Diplomats in Early Modern Europe<\/em> (Oxford: OUP, 2020)<\/p>\nPal, Ma\u00efa, \u2018Early modern extraterritoriality, diplomacy, and the transition to capitalism\u2019 in\u00a0 The extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics <\/em>(London: Routledge, 2019)<\/p>\nRivere de Carles, Nathalie (ed), Early Modern Diplomacy, Theatre and Soft Power: The Making of Peace <\/em>(London: Palgrave, 2016)<\/p>\nS\u00e1ez-Hidalgo, Ana; Berta Cano-Echevarr\u00eda, Exile,\u00a0diplomacy\u00a0and texts : exchanges between Iberia and the British Isles, 1500\u20131767 <\/em>(Amsterdam: Brill, 2020).<\/p>\nScott, Hamish. M. \u00a0British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution <\/em>(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)<\/p>\nSowerby, Tracey A.,\u00a0 Craigwood\u00a0Joanna\u00a0 (ed.), Cultures of Diplomacy and Literary Writing in the Early Modern World<\/em>, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)<\/p>\nWatkins, John. 2008. \u201cToward a New Diplomatic History of Medieval and Early Modern Europe.\u201d\u00a0Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies<\/em>\u00a038:1\u201314<\/p>\nWelch, Ellen R. A Theatre of Diplomacy: International Relations and the Performing Arts in Early Modern France<\/em>\u00a0 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017)<\/p>\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0TERRITORIES OF DIPLOMACY: THE ANGLO-AMERICAN WORLD AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN THE 17TH AND 18 TH CENTURIES TERRITOIRES DE DIPLOMATIE\u00a0: LE MONDE ANGLO-AMERICAIN ET SES RELATIONS EXTERIEURES AUX XVIIE ET XVIIIE SIECLES 20-21 \/ 01 \/ 2022 \u00a048\u00e8me Colloque de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u2019Etudes Anglo-Am\u00e9ricaines des XVII et XVIII si\u00e8cles en partenariat \/ with DiplomaticA, Centre Roland […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":111,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-470","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/470","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/111"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=470"}],"version-history":[{"count":54,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":681,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/470\/revisions\/681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.univ-tlse2.fr\/ambassadeurs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}