All posts by Palethnologie

2016-REVIEW

Cover 2016

CONTENTS


The household in the Americas


Adrian L. BURKE

HOUSEHOLD ARCHAEOLOGY
A Transatlantic Comparative Approach


John L. CREESE

EXTENDING THE RAFTERS:
The Iroquoian Longhouse as a Sociotechnical System


Jennifer BIRCH

RELATIONS OF POWER AND PRODUCTION IN ANCESTRAL WENDAT COMMUNITIES


Christina B. RIETH

LATE PREHISTORIC HOUSEHOLD ARCHAEOLOGY IN EASTERN NEW YORK


Michel PLOURDE

THE HOUSEHOLD AMONG IROQUOIAN SEAL HUNTERS OF THE PROVINCE OF CANADA
DURING THE LATE WOODLAND PERIOD (1000-1535 CE)


Claude CHAPDELAINE

FOR A SOCIAL ARCHAEOLOGY AT THE DROULERS / TSIIONHIAKWATHA AND MAILHOT-CURRAN SITES


Christian GATES ST-PIERRE, Marie-Ève BOISVERT, Maude CHAPDELAINE

USING WORKED BONES TO STUDY IROQUOIAN HOUSEHOLDS:
The Case of the St. Lawrence Iroquoians from Saint-Anicet, Quebec


Claire ST-GERMAIN, Michelle COURTEMANCHE

THE FAUNA EXPLOITED BY THE HOUSEHOLDS AT THE MAILHOT-CURRAN SITE (BGFN-2)


Christina T. HALPERIN, Antonia FOIAS

HOUSEHOLD GARBAGE:
Classic period (ca. 300-900 CE) Maya Practices of Discard


The household in Europe


Karim GERNIGON

VILLAGES BEFORE HOUSES?
The neolithization of Europe reconsidered through the concept of the household


Jean GUILAINE

NEOLITHIC HOUSES:
Mediterranean Examples


Copyright and Plagiarism Policy

COPYRIGHT

Each author publishing in P@lethnology is required to sign the form which can be downloaded here.

Copyright transfer agreement

To the editorial committee of P@lethnology journal,

I, the undersigned,……………………….,

hereby assign full and permanent copyright to P@lethnology journal for the article entitled:

……………………………………………………………………………..

I also acknowledge that I have taken note of the following conditions:

1. The author may freely republish this article (in printed or electronic format) on any institutional or personal website and in institutional repositories, on the condition that:

– he/she does not submit the article to another journal during the evaluation period;

– he/she clearly references the original publication in P@lethnology;

– he/she requests permission from the journal editor (vanessa.lea@univ-tlse2.fr).

2. The author of an accepted text guarantees P@lethnology journal against all action by third-parties (editors, authors etc.) whose copyright may have been infringed, intentionally or unintentially. In the instance of plagiarism, the author is solely responsible and he/she guarantees the accuracy of all references and citations. Regarding the publication of photographic, iconographic or other documents, the author must inform himself or herself of any existing copyright and obtain the necessary permission to publish the documents.

Town/city: ……………………………

Date: ………………………………..

Signature: ……………………………

Plagiarism Policy

Definition of plagiarism

“Plagiarism is:
– the copying of someone else’s creative work and presenting it as one’s own;
– the collecting of extracts of text, images, data etc. from external sources and including them in one’s own work without proper citation;
– summarising an author’s original idea and formulating it in one’s own words without citing the source.

Plagiarism is not only dishonest, but is an offence which can lead to sanctions.”

http://www.bibl.ulaval.ca/infosphere/sciences/evaciter1.html, accessed 01/08/2016 (translated from French)

Problems and risks

Plagiarism undermines the moral and proprietary rights of the author. It demonstrates a lack of personal reflection and a lack of commitment to academic work.

Citing sources

Please refer to the “BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES” section of our guidelines for authors.

2015-18-WOLF-CONARD

PERSONAL ORNAMENTS OF THE SWABIAN AURIGNACIAN

Sibylle WOLF, Nicholas J. CONARD

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

In the caves of the Swabian Jura (Southwest Germany) excavators found numerous mammoth ivory remains, which date to the Aurignacian. Among them were at least 600 beads. These beads come from the well stratified layers of Hohle Fels cave in the Ach Valley, while others derive from the backdirt in front of the Vogelherd cave in the Lone Valley, which was completely emptied during the excavation 1931. We give an overview about the variety of forms of the personal ornaments, although the double perforated bead dominates the inventories. This special bead form gives evidence of identity formation of the Aurignacian people.

To cite this article

Wolf S., Conard N.J., 2015 – Personal Ornaments of the Swabian Aurignacian, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 330-345.

2015-17-FLOSS

THE OLDEST PORTABLE ART:

the Aurignacian Ivory Figurines
from the Swabian Jura (Southwest Germany)

Harald FLOSS

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

Four cave sites in the Swabian Jura have yielded a spectacular array of portable art: Hohle Fels, Geißenklösterle, Vogelherd, and Hohlenstein-Stadel. Some of these ivory figurines are well known, and others less so. In all, about fifty such objects or fragments of objects are known from the region. They occur in the same archaeological levels where have been found musical instruments (flutes) and early examples of painting. Drawing on recent research as well as archival records from earlier excavations, this contribution chose a simple question-and-answer format in order to revisit issues of the interpretation of Aurignacian portable art objects, which constitute some of the earliest known representational artifacts in Europe, and perhaps the world. Subjects addressed include informations about raw materials, iconography, dating, context and the possible social foundations underlying the production and use of these objects.

To cite this article

Floss H., 2015 – The Oldest Portable Art: the Aurignacian Ivory Figurines from the Swabian Jura (Southwest Germany), in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 315-329.

2015-16-FRITZ-TOSELLO

FROM GESTURE TO MYTH:

Artists’ techniques on the walls of Chauvet Cave

Carole FRITZ, Gilles TOSELLO

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

The walls of the Chauvet-Pont d’Arc Cave are decorated with charcoal drawings dated to an average of 36000 cal BP, red paintings, engravings, and finger-traced designs, all grouped in distinct panels. Examination of the 14C dates, which are increasingly revealed to be of great antiquity, dating to the Early Aurignacian, allows for more precise modeling of human use of the cave. The attribution of certain components of the parietal art to the Gravettian, based on directly dated torch-marks on the walls and charcoal on the cave floors, remains secure. A survey of the techniques employed, organized around the three colors used (white, black, red), reveals formal diversity in the site, and at the same time confirms multiple points of convergence and commonality in terms of the themes and composition of the panels, which underline the homogeneity of the works as an ensemble. Ethology and the theme of cave lions on the hunt hold a central place in the inspiration of the artists at Chauvet; through their spectacular frescos, these artists have provided us a point of access to their symbolic vision of the world and an element of their myths.

To cite this article

Fritz C., Tosello G., 2015 – From Gesture to Myth: Artists’ techniques on the walls of Chauvet Cave, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 280-314.

2015-15-AZEMA

ANIMATION AND GRAPHIC NARRATION IN THE AURIGNACIAN

Marc AZÉMA

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

What was the purpose of the images conceived and produced by prehistoric groups? Our research into the animation of these images leads us to propose a new method of analysis that shows their primary function to be narrative. The identification of mechanisms for graphic narration can help to decipher the exact content conveyed by these messages beginning as early as the Aurignacian. The main images from two parietal art caves from this period, Chauvet-Pont d’Arc and Baume Latrone in the South of France, provide a remarkable example of the different animation processes and sequencing underlying these first Aurignacian stories.

To cite this article

Azéma M., 2015 – Animation and Graphic Narration in the Aurignacian, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 256-279.

2015-14-GARATE-ETAL

EVALUATING AURIGNACIAN ART IN IBERIA…

If it Really Exists

Diego GARATE, Olivia RIVERO, Joseba RIOS-GARAIZAR

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

Recent discoveries over the past years have confirmed the existence of figurative art from the very beginning of the Upper Paleolithic. Researchers have focused on the identification of this phenomenon in some regions (Dordogne, Ardeche or Swabian Jura), whereas in others, such as the Iberian Peninsula, have been somewhat neglected. After a thorough analysis of the Iberian artistic record, we are now in a position to characterize the early stages of figurative art (both portable and rock art), which was mainly concentrated in the northern region of the Iberian Peninsula. This concentration corresponds to the dense distribution of archaeological sites attributed to the Aurignacian culture. Although the existing literature is at times incomplete or somewhat inconclusive, we consider an attribution to Aurignacian art to be possible in certain cases.

To cite this article

Garate D., Rivero O., Rios-Garaizar J., 2015 – Evaluating Aurignacian Art in Iberia… if it Really Exists, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 236-255.

2015-13-PETROGNANI

EARLY UPPER PALEOLITHIC PARIETAL ART:

Shared Characteristics and Different Symbolic Traditions

Stephane PETROGNANI

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

What symbolic traditions can be defined at the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic? Can we characterize specific Aurignacian, Gravettian or Solutrean approaches? This thematic-stylistic analysis applied to a sample of 2 000 representations in nearly 110 caves provides some partial answers to these questions and reveals continuity in the “artistic traditions” of early Upper Paleolithic groups. Other observations show the complexity of artistic representations through time-bound and location-bound “traditions” and speak to the plurality of symbolic behavior in prehistoric societies.

We highlight a decrease in the diversity of stylistic resources used by Paleolithic groups throughout the Upper Paleolithic. Graphic standards imposed by the group tend to become more rigid, limiting the scope of the prehistoric artist and leading to a set repertoire of certain formal graphic representations. Due to this decrease in the “freedom” of iconographic codes, which become increasingly standardized, the role of the Paleolithic artist in society is reconsidered and appears to reflect social changes.

To cite this article

Petrognani S., 2015 – Early Upper Paleolithic Parietal Art: Shared Characteristics and Different Symbolic Traditions, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 221-235.

2015-12-SAUVET

IN SEARCH OF LOST TIME.
DATING METHODS FOR PREHISTORIC ART:

the Example of Aurignacian Sites

Georges SAUVET

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

The need for an accurate chronological framework is particularly important for the early phases of the Upper Paleolithic, which correspond to the first works of art attributed to Aurignacian groups. Carbon-14 is the only method used for the direct dating of organic pigments, but indirect methods are used to date subsequent deposits on rock art (thermoluminescence, OSL, Uranium/thorium, etc.). All these methods are based on hypotheses and present interpretative difficulties, which form the basis of the discussion presented in this article.

To cite this article

Sauvet G., 2015 – In Search of Lost Time. Dating Methods for Prehistoric Art: the Example of Aurignacian Sites, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 206-220.

2015-11-ALVAREZ

MARINE RESOURCE EXPLOITATION DURING
THE MIDDLE AND EARLY UPPER PALEOLITHIC IN EUROPE:

Overview of the Available Evidence

Esteban ÁLVAREZ-FERNÁNDEZ

Icone pdf   Download

Abstract

In this article, we propose a critical analysis of the available information relating to the first evidence of marine resource consumption in European Pleistocene sites, with particular focus on the existing data for the Mousterian and the Aurignacian. This review concentrates on different aspects, such as the identification and quantification of remains, as well as taphonomic characteristics. In spite of the rarity of the available remains, we consider that mollusks, mammals, crustaceans, echinoderms, fish and birds play a secondary role in the diet of both Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans.

To cite this article

Álvarez-Fernández E., 2015 – Marine Resource Exploitation during the Middle and Early Upper Paleolithic in Europe: Overview of the Available Evidence, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 188-205.