avril 2011

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for avril 2011.

Colloque – Vaccination, Society and Politics

 

Berlin, 28-30 April

Vaccination, Society and Politics. Sociopolitical developments and the implementation of new medical practices- analyzed through the practice of vaccination.

Organized by Berlin School of Public Health and Institute of the History of Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin.

In 2007, the Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was the first of its kind after a decades search to prevent a cancer, cervical carcinoma, to be officially recommended by the German government.While it is an important step in individual cancer prevention, this vaccine also adds a new milestone to vaccination history itself.

The symposium seeks to examine the complexities of the supposedly existing paradigm change in vaccination practice through a historical and sociopolitical lens. Presentations will combine the current historical and social science research on vaccination practice on societal and individual levels with the analysis of the different political and social contexts in which vaccination has been carried out.

Further information at http://bsph.charite.de/aktuelles/

For further information and to register please contact _Susanne Blödt at_ Susanne.bloedt@charite.de <mailto:Susanne.bloedt@charite.de>.

Program:

*Thursday, April 28, 2011*

9.15
Christine Holmberg/Marion Hulverscheidt: Introduction//
Session 1 The meaning of the development of a „population“-based national policy for the implementation of medical practices – the smallpox vaccine as stabilizer of the population of the nation state__

9.30
Marion Hulverscheidt, Berlin: The development of the smallpox vaccine in the nation state in the 19th century.

10.15
Eberhard Wolff, Zürich: Smallpox vaccine: example of modern culture in prevention?

11.00
Coffee break

11.30
Axel Hüntelmann, Bielefeld: The biopolitical development from 1848 to Wilhelmine Germany.

11.45
Commentary (Volker Hess, Berlin) and discussion

12.30
Lunch break

Session 2 The demarcation and establishment of national identity – introducing a vaccine to counter tuberculosis

14.00
Christian Bonah, Strassburg: Evidence and implementation: BCG vaccination strategies with human beings in France, Germany and Great Britain, 1905- 1960

14.45
Niels Brimnes, Aarhus: The unwanted vaccine – opposition to BCG vaccination in India 1948-1958′

15.30
Coffee break

16.00
Arnd Bauerkämper, Berlin: The Transfer of Knowledge and the Twisted Road to a Transnational Civil Society. Recent Research and Perspectives of Scholarship in Historical Perspective

16.45
Commentary (Christoph Gradmann, Oslo) and Discussion

17.30
Session finishes

*Friday, April 29, 2011*

Session 3 Globalization and liberation – Vaccination becomes success strategy and disease extinction the goal of international policy

9.30
Paul Grenough, Iowa City: Vaccination, Liberation and Globalization: Three Super Currencies in the Late-Modern Bazaar

10.15
Stuart Blume/Janneke Tump, Amsterdam: The development and introduction of new vaccines in the Netherlands, 1960-2000

11.00
Coffee break

11.45
Andrea Stöckl, Norwich: The MMR debate – the state, its citizens, and public health

12.30
Lunch break

Session 4 Neoliberalism and Health Prevention

14.00
Signild Vallgarda, Kopenhagen: Governing technologies and governing ambitions in public health policies. Continuity and change

14.45
Samantha Gottlieb, San Francisco: Manufactured Uncertainty: Merck and the commodification of choice

15.30
Coffee break

16.00
Laura Mamo, San Francisco: Risky Girlhood – how the HPV-vaccine became the right tool for U.S. cancer prevention

16.45
Discussion

17.30
Session finishes

*Saturday, April 30, 2011*

Session 5 Development of medical practices in light of sociopolitical changes

9.30
Katja Sabisch, Bochum: “Hopelessly infested”: the discursive infectiosity of the Human papillomavirus in German media, 2006-2009“

10.15
Ilana Löwy, Paris: « Because of the risk »: Debates on HPV vaccine in France and in Brasil

11.00
Coffee break

11.30
NN: Commentary with an outlook on GAVI – new forms of global governance and public-private partnerships?

12.15
Marion Hulverscheidt/Christine Holmberg: Final discussion with the development of new, joint research projects

13.00
Farewell

14.00
Symposium finishes

Tags: , , ,

Colloque – Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine

 

18-21 May, 2011
Uppsala, Sweden

 

Most welcome to four exciting days on the theme of Feminist Phenomenology and Medicine! Key-notes are, among others, Prof. Gail Weiss, Prof. Margrit Shildrick, Prof. Nikki Sullivan and Prof. Cressida Heyes.

Please register by May 1, 2011 at www.genna.gender.uu.se/femphenmed

Conference program:

Wednesday, May 18

University Main Building
9.00-9.30 Registration

Lecture Hall X
9.30-9.45 Welcome

9.45-11.00 Samantha Murray, Macquarie University
Not just fat to thin: Trans-en-abled? embodiment after weight loss surgery?
Commentary by Ellen Feder, American University

11.00-12.15 Margrit Shildrick, Queens University Belfast
Visceral phenomenology: organ transplantation, identity and sexual difference?
Commentary by Gail Weiss, George Washington University

12.15-14.00 LUNCH

14.00-15.30 Parallel session 1

English Park Campus 7-0042
1A Norms and resistance: Illness, aging and dying
Caitríona Ní Dhúill, Durham University
Engaging biography: Feminist approaches to reading illness in life narratives
Linn Sandberg, Linköping University
Touch me, I want to feel your body!: Old age, masculinity and meanings of touch
Michael Lundblad, Colorado State University
The female animal at the end of life: Terry Tempest Williams and the biopolitics of terminal cancer

English Park Campus 7-0043
1B Exclusions and erasure
Ulrica Engdahl, Linköping University
Recognition of the lived experience of identity
Erika Sigvardsdotter, Uppsala University
Bare life embodied Undocumented persons as legal residuals in the Swedish welfare state
Brenda Beagan, Lisa Goldberg & Ami Harbin, Dalhousie University
A feminist phenomenological approach to the health care encounters of queer women and providers in Eastern Canada?

15.30-16.00 BREAK

16.oo-17.30 Parallel session 2

English Park Campus 7-0042
2A Knowledge production
Wilhelm Kardemark, Karlstad University
Knowledge and responsibility?
Kamilla Peuravaara, Uppsala University
Entering the field and becoming the other for oneself as a researcher: a phenomenological approach

English Park Campus 7-0043
2B Social biology
Alexander Edmonds, University of Amsterdam
Bare sex
Denise Malmberg, Uppsala University
The gender of bodily fluids and odours
Astrida Neimanis
Morning sickness

Thursday, May 19

University Main Building

Lecture Hall X
9.00-10.15 Fredrik Svenaeus, Södertörn University
The Body Uncanny: Alienation, Illness and Anorexia
Commentary by Dorothée Legrand, École Polytechnique

10.15-10.30 BREAK

Lecture Hall IX
10.30-11.45 Linda Fisher, Central European University
The illness experience: a feminist phenomenological perspective?
Commentary by Samantha Murray, Macquarie University

11.45-13.00 Abby Wilkerson, George Washington University
Depression, phenomenology, and feminist disability studies
Commentary by Marja-Liisa Honkasalo, Linköping University

13.00-14.30 LUNCH

English Park Campus 7-0042
14.30-15.45 Lanei M. Rodemeyer, Duquesne University
Feminism, phenomenology, and hormones
Commentary by Fredrik Svenaeus, Södertörn University

15.45-17.00 Paul Qualtere-Burcher and Sarah LaChance Adams, University of Oregon
The communal push and its implications for Merleau-Ponty´s theory of intersubjectivity
Commentary by Cressida J. Heyes, University of Alberta

17.00-17.30 BREAK

English Park Campus Ihre
17.30-18.45 Nikki Sullivan, Macquarie University
Body Integrity Identity Disorder and the phenomenology of perception?
Commentary by Lisa Folkmarson Käll, Uppsala University

19.00 Reception

Friday, May 20

University Main Building

Lecture Hall X
9.00-10.15 Marja-Liisa Honkasalo, Linköping University
Doing illness, doing time ? phenomenological perspectives on gender and agency
Commentary by Paul Qualtere-Burcher and Sara LaChance Adams, University of Oregon

10.15-10.30 BREAK

Lecture Hall IX
10.30-11.45 Cressida J. Heyes: ?Anaesthetics of existence, University of Alberta
Commentary by Lanei M Rodemeyer, Duquesne University

Lecture Hall IX
11.45-13.00 Kristin Zeiler and Lisa Guntram, Linköping University
Female embodiment reconsidered: Disruption, Style and Life with no Vagina or Womb
Commentary by Linda Fisher, Central European University

13.00-14.30 LUNCH

14.30-15.30 Parallel session 3

English Park Campus 16-0043
3A Gender and Cardiac Problems
Diane Pitt, University of Hull
Women, hearts and narrative: A case for a phenomenological approach to clinical diagnostics
Michael Deere, Salem State University
Towards a Phenomenology of Pains and Bodies

English Park Campus 7-0043
3B Gendered Violence
Christa Binswanger, University of Basel & Lotta Samelius, National Swedish Police Academy
Tranquilized Bodies and Suffering in Intersubjective Meaning-Making
Jessica Cadwallader, University of Groningen
Stopping Suffering: Rape, PTSD and the potentials of ‘therapeutic forgetting’

15.30-16.00 BREAK

English Park Campus 16-0043
16.00-17.15 Dorothée Legrand, École Polytechnique
Mafalda a-voiding soup: anorexia and the hollowed female body
Commentary by Erik Malmqvist, Université Paris Descartes

18.30 CONFERENCE DINNER

Saturday, May 21

English Park Campus Ihre

9-00-10.15 Gail Weiss, George Washington University
?Un-cosmetic surgeries in an age of normativity?
Commentary by Nikki Sullivan, Macquarie University

10.15-10.30 BREAK

English Park Campus 7-0042
10.30-11.45 Ellen Feder, American University
Reassigning Ambiguity: Intersex, Biomedicine, and the Question of Harm
Commentary by Kristin Zeiler and Lisa Guntram, Linköping University

11.45-13.00 Erik Malmqvist, Université Paris Descartes
Towards a phenomenology of complicity with dubious social norms: The case of cosmetic surgery
Commentary by Margrit Shildrick, Queens University Belfast

13.00-14.30 LUNCH

English Park Campus 7-0042
14.30-15.45 Lisa Folkmarson Käll, Uppsala University
An ethics of exposure
Commentary by Abby Wilkerson, George Washington University

15.45-16.00 BREAK

16.00-17.00 Closing discussion

Tags: , ,

Atelier – La refonte de l’homme, empirisme médical et philosophie de la nature humaine en Europe, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles

 

9-12 mai 2011

Oganisé dans le cadre de l’ANR PHILOMED (S. Buchenau, A-L. Rey et C. Crignon) et du programme de coopération Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Villa Vigoni, Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’homme.

Coordination C. Crignon (Université Bourgogne), C. Zelle (université de Bochum) et N. Allocca (Université Roma La Sapienza).

Le premier atelier a pour titre : « La refonte de l’homme, empirisme médical et philosophie de la nature humaine en Europe, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles ».

Il aura lieu du 9 au 12 mai à la Villa Vigoni, en Italie.

Ateliers de recherche italo-franco-allemands en sciences sociales et humaines.

Programme de coopération Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) / Villa Vigoni / Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme (FMSH)

La refonte de l’homme. Empirisme médical et philosophie de la nature humaine en Europe. XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles


Atelier I

9-12 mai 2011

Lieu : Villa Vigoni (Italie)

Coordonnés par C. Crignon (Université de Bourgogne), Carsten Zelle (Université de Bochum) et N. Allocca (Université Roma la Sapienza).

Organisation S. Buchenau, A-L. Rey et C. Crignon.

Avec la participation de la Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, de l’ANR Philomed, de l’Institut Universitaire de France et de l’Ambassade de France en Italie.

10 mai

9h30-12h45

1.             Définitions de l’empirisme médical

Présidence de séance R. Behrens

9h30–10h15 – Domenico Betoloni Meli : ‘L’empirismo in anatomia: tre livelli di diversita’ da Massa e Vesalio a Malpighi’.

10h15-11h00 – Maria Conforti : Incertezza ed empirismo: corpi meccanici e corpi chimici nella medicina italiana del Seicento.

Pause

11h15-12h00 – Siegfried Bodenmann : L’art d’observer en comparaison. Qu’est ce qui fait la spécificité de l’empirisme médical – Die Kunst des Beobachtens im Vergleich. Worin besteht die Spezifität des medizinischen Empirismus’?

12h00-12h45 – Bettina Wahrig : ‘Mechanick, Rationalität, Erfahrung : Richard Meads Theorie des Gifte 1702-1747‘.

Déjeuner

14h30-17h00

2.             Traditions de l’empirisme  : dialogues et querelles anciens / modernes

Président de séance A-L Rey

14h30-15h15 – Guido Giglioni : Francis Bacon e la nozione di « experientia literata »

15h15-16h00 – Claire Crignon-De Oliveira : le débat sur la methodus medendi en Angleterre à l’âge classique : quelles lectures de l’empirisme antique ? (Bacon, Boyle, Willis).

Pause

16h15-17h00 – Nunzio Alloca : “Meccanica del vivente” e ricerca sperimentale: l’anatomo-fisiologia di Claude Perrault e l’Académie Royale des sciences


11 mai

9h30-12h45

  1. 3. Empirisme médical et théorie de la connaissance

Présidence de séance D. B. Meli

9h30–10h15 – Carsten Zelle : Experiment, Beobachtung, Selbstbeobachtung. Formen anthropologischer Empirie bei den « Vernünftigen Ärzten » in der deutschsprachigen Aufklärung.

10h15-11h00 – Sarah Carvallo : Classer les maladies : classifications empiriques et classifications systématiques (Sydenham, Hoffmann et Stahl)

Pause

11h15-12h00 – Roberto Lo Presti : Forme dell’ osservazione empirica e strutture dell’argomentazione nei trattati medici di Julien Offray de la Mettrie (Traité du vertige, Traité de la petite vérole, Observations de médecine pratique)

12h00-12h45 – Claire Etchegaray : La méthode expérimentale chez les médecins des Lumières écossaises

Déjeuner

14h30-17h00

  1. 4. Raison et expérience

Présidence de séance S. Buchenau

14h30-15h15 – Paolo Quintili : La Scuola di Montpellier nel XVII e XVIII secolo: empirismo, medicina, metafisica (A. Maubec, F. Boissier de Sauvages, Th. de Bordeu)

15h15-16h00 – Delphine Kolesnik : Raison et expérience chez deux médecins cartésiens : Regius et La Forge

Pause

16h15-17h00 – Nicolas Pethes : Therapeutische Experimente in der Literatur von Wieland bis Goethe


12 mai

9h30-11h00

5.             L’empirisme médical : récit et argumentation

Présidence R. Lo Presti

9h30–10h15 – Hans-Peter Nowitziki: Christoph Wilhelm Hufelands Auseinandersetzung mit Johann Benjamin Ehrhards „razioneller Medizin“.

10h15-11h00 – Yvonne Wübben: Hermeneutik und Experiment. Die Fabel als anthropologische Textsorte

Pause

11h15-12h00Synthèse des débats : Philippe Hamou

 

Tags: ,

Appel à contribution – Standards and Drug use outside the Pharmacy

Call for papers Deadline : June 15 2011

Conference to be held in Lyon, December 15, 16, 17 2011

 

What happens to drugs once they are marketed and prescribed? Does the passage of a pharmaceutical product into the public faithfully mirror what was intended or expected by the scientists who conceived it or by the pharmaceutical company that produced and marketed it? The trajectories of these products in the public are difficult to predict, whether at the level of physicians’ prescriptions or of patients’ consumption. The fact that most drugs are consumed (or not) in a context beyond the direct control of the medical profession limits the possibilities for standardising their use and gauging the totality of their effects.

As several historians of biomedicine have argued, the appropriation of drugs by physicians and patients is an important factor in their historical and economic trajectories. This appropriation often challenges the notion of ‘standardization’ as understood by the manufacturer and institutional regulator of the product. The level of consumption may be higher or lower than originally expected. The prescription may differ from the indications suggested by the manufacturer, and in some cases the development of addiction or practices of drug abuse can radically change the consumer’s relationship to the drug. Thus, the destiny of a drug in the public may be quite different from the one envisaged or even imagined by the manufacturer, the scientists and the health authorities. One of the aims of this conference is to discuss ‘unpredictable trajectories’ in the public, whether they be off-label use or the deliberate ‘misuse’ of drugs prescribed for a different patient or use.

In some cases, the trajectory of drugs in the public can reveal failures in the standardization of drugs. Side-effects, in particular dramatic ones including patient deaths, make these failures public. We would like to consider two aspects of this question. The first one concerns the drama itself and what it teaches us about the standardization of drugs (the process, rules, experiments, and expertise, as well as what failed or what was predictable). The second point is about the public attitude to such dramas; how they change the representations of drugs and the behaviour of the consumers. We would also like to consider how such affairs contribute to the emergence of patient associations and movements. Such high-profile affairs also change the relationship between patients, pharmaceutical firms and public health bodies. Thus, we can consider the history of certain drugs in the public as testifying to the failure of standardization.

Finally, pharmaceutical industrialists, patients and public health administrations were aware from the beginning that the fate of drugs in the public was difficult to manage and control. Thus, they aimed to establish rules for the marketing of drugs, including the supervision of prescriptions and compliance with the indications. There have also been initiatives to collect data about drugs effects and indications with the aim of defining the optimal use of the drugs, often with the collaboration of patient associations. Thus, the final issue we would like to raise concerns the standardization of drug alert mechanisms (for example the organization of ‘pharmacovigilance’ in France beginning in the 1970s and traceability of products).

We invite papers on the following themes:

1. “Unpredictable trajectories”: – Studies in drug consumption (quantitative and qualitative data). – Drug misuse, non-use and abuse. – Second lives of drugs: when the public use of drugs changes indications and prescriptions.

2. Drugs in the public: failures of standardization: – Unpredictable side-effects and their consequences. – Public affairs and scandals: changes in the public perception of drugs.

3. The public life of drugs and the limits of control: – The regulation of drugs markets: supervising prescriptions. – Patients as consumers: how to control the use and consumption of drugs? – Traceability of drugs and standardization.

Europeans presenting papers at this conference will have their travel and accommodation provided by the European Science Foundation.

Abstracts of not more than 450 words should be submitted before June 15 2011.

Please send your abstract in ‘rtf’ format to the addresses of the organisers.

Sophie Chauveau; sophie.chauveau@ish-lyon.cnrs.fr Ulrike Thoms; ulrike.thoms@charite.de Jonathan Simon; jonathan.simon@univ-lyon1.fr

Note that papers will be pre-circulated prior to the conference.

Please address any enquiries to the organisers.

Tags: ,

Contrat post-doctoral : expertise en santé publique / santé au travail

Dimanche 15 mai 2011  |  Strasbourg (67000)

 

Laboratoire de rattachement : Groupe de sociologie politique européenne (GSPE, PRISME, UMR 7012, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg)

Poste à pourvoir dans le cadre du programme de recherche INDEX : « L’indépendance des experts et ses problèmes dans le champ de la santé publique : expertises en pratique et enjeux de communication » financé par l’ANR, responsable scientifique : Emmanuel Henry (GSPE), partenaires : Claude Gilbert (PACTE) et Jean-Noël Jouzel (CSO)

Durée : Contrat à temps plein sur deux ans à partir de septembre 2011.

Lieu de travail : Strasbourg

Niveau de salaire : 2400 euros bruts mensuels environ.

Missions

Le post-doctorant, titulaire d’une thèse de sciences sociales (sociologie, science politique, notamment), devra remplir 2 missions correspondant chacune à un mi-temps environ :

1re mission : Organisation et secrétariat scientifique d’un séminaire de recherche et travail éditorial sur le projet de publication qui lui est lié.

Le séminaire rassemble une vingtaine de chercheurs à raison de 2 à 3 séances par an.
En lien avec les responsables du projet et l’équipe administrative de la Misha, le travail consiste à organiser le séminaire sur un plan logistique (missions et organisation sur place), et assurer son suivi scientifique : mise en place et suivi d’outils de mutualisation de documents, relecture et corrections avant diffusion des retranscriptions des échanges, échanges avec les intervenants entre les séances, etc…

Travail d’édition : le séminaire devant déboucher sur une publication collective, le recruté assurera le travail d’édition en lien avec les responsables scientifiques : demandes formulées aux auteurs, corrections et échanges autour des textes, travail de suivi des différentes versions, relectures et corrections, etc.

2e mission : travail de recherche dans le domaine de l’expertise en santé au travail.

Ce travail de recherche portera sur un des thèmes couverts par le projet INDEX dans le domaine de la santé au travail. Il s’agira en lien avec le responsable scientifique de mener une enquête de sociologie qualitative sur l’émergence et la transformation de l’expertise publique dans le domaine de la santé mentale au travail en se centrant sur les exemples français et européens sur la période récente. Le contenu du projet lui-même devra faire l’objet d’une élaboration en commun avec les responsables du programme pour être en cohérence avec les objectifs d’ensemble du programme.

Procédure de recrutement

Les candidatures pourront être reçues jusqu’au 15 mai 2011.

Elles seront composées d’une lettre de motivation et d’un CV et envoyés à : emmanuel.henry@misha.fr.

Tags:

Appel à contribution – Les archives du corps

Mardi 31 mai 2011  |  Cambridge (CB1 2EW, Grande-Bretagne)

 

An International Workshop to be held at Hughes Hall, University of Cambridge, 8–9 September 2011

What are the archives of the body? Can the body serve as an archive itself? What sources tell us the most about the body? This workshop, sponsored by the Académie Nationale de Médecine, Paris, aims to bring together historians, literary scholars, art historians and archaeologists to explore multiple types of evidence about human bodies in the medieval and early modern periods, in Europe, the New World and the Muslim and Jewish worlds.

The sources examined might include: the archives of hospitals, universities and medical academies; civic, monastic, ecclesiastical and judicial records; iconographic sources, medical treatises and archaeological data.

A keynote paper, ‘The Body in Pain and Tales of Election and Damnation during the French Wars of Religion’, will be presented by Dr Luc Racaut (School of Historical Studies, University of Newcastle).

Possible topics may include:

The holy body
Iconoclasm, corporal mortification
Medicine and diseased bodies
Anatomical knowledge and pathology
Gender, nudity and sexuality
Bodily difference and disability
The body as a commodity
Beauty and the ideal body
Senses, sensitivity and emotions

How to apply ?

Proposals for 20-minute papers are invited from

advanced scholars,
early career researchers and
doctoral students.
Paper abstracts no longer than 300 words, with a brief CV and full contact details, should be emailed to both

Dr Elma Brenner (ehob2@cam.ac.uk) and
Dr Elena Taddia (elena@earlymodernhistory.com)
by 31 May 2011.

The language of the workshop will be English.

Applicants will be notified of the outcome of their submission by 15 June 2011.

Comité scientifique :

Elma Brenner – Wellcome Trust Research Fellow,  Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge
Elena Taddia – Docteur ès Lettres ENS –Lyon, Trinity College Research Fellow, Dublin
Luc Racaut, School of Historical Studies, University of Newcastle
Laurence Camous, directrice de la Bibliothèque de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine, Paris
Jérôme Van Wjiland, conservateur de la  Bibliothèque de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine, Paris

Contact
Elena Taddia
courriel : elena (at) earlymodernhistory [point] com

Tags: , ,

Séminaire – Machines et imagination

 

8 avril 2011

SALLE 646A-Mondrian: 10h.00 – 17h.00

Les salles sont dans le bâtiment Condorcet

SPHERE / Université Paris Diderot-Paris7

4 rue Elsa Morante, 75205 PARIS CEDEX 13

(Accès : voir http://www.rehseis.cnrs.fr/spip.php?rubrique74)

 

Animé par Pierre Cassou-Nogues, Viktoria Tkaczyk, Koen Vermeir


La machine et la parole, avec : Julia Kursell, Brigitte Felderer, Frederic Pascal, Mara Mills, Avital Ronell, Viktoria Tkaczyk

10h.00:

– Julia Kursell (Berlin): Hearing Machines: Helmholtz and Phonology

– Brigitte Felderer (Vienna): The willing suspension of disbelief

– Frederic Pascal (Paris): Machines et paroles: de l’analyse à la quête de la synthèse

14h.30:

– Mara Mills (New York): Text-to-Speech: Reading Machines and the History of « Print Disability »

– Avital Ronell (New York): Exploded Tropologies and Technodisaster

– Viktoria Tkaczyk (Paris): Commentaire et discussion
Autres séances:
*6 MAI : LA MACHINE A PENSER*

SALLE 646A-Mondrian: 9h.30 – 18h.00

Stephen Gaukroger (Sydney): Transcending our natural cognitive powers: Leibniz, Newton, and the justification of the calculus

Jessica Riskin (Stanford/Paris): The Restless Clock

Mathieu Triclot (Belfort): La symbiose homme-machine ou l’informatique comme un jeuHélène Machinal (Brest): Post-humanité, machine à penser et oralité dans Ghostwritten de David Mitchell (1999)

Sdyney Levy (Paris/Santa Cruz): Une Machine à aimer: le cas HadalyXavier Mauméjean (Valencienne): L’esprit de corps

Pierre Cassou-Nogues (Paris): Commentaire et discussion

*1 JUIN: IMAGE DE LA « MACHINE-HOMME »*

SALLE Klein 612B: : 9h.30 – 18h.00

Charles Woolfe (Sydney): Living machines to animal economie

Heidi Voskuhl (Harvard): The Enlightenment automaton in industrial modernity

J.-F. Baillon (Bordeaux) : De Caligari à Churchill : femmes-machines  et hommes d’acier dans le cinéma britannique des années 1930 aux années 1960Jan Söffner (Cologne) : Can avatars feel?

Denis Mellier (Poitiers) : Titre à préciserGilles Ménégaldo (Poitiers) : Robots et androïdes au cinéma: entre humain et inhumain

Wladimir Velminski (Berlin) « Machine of Innovation: Aleksej Gastev’s homo sovieticus »Koen Vermeir (Paris) : Commentaire et discussion

Tags: , , , ,

Séminaire – Les représentations de l’embryon et du foetus humains : approche pluridisciplinaire

Jeudi 7 avril
17h-19h
Centre Alexandre Koyré
57 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris
.
Dans le cadre du séminaire « Les représentations de l’embryon et du foetus humains : approche pluridisciplinaire » :
Conférence de Jean-François TERNAY : « Imagerie médicale et vulnérabilité » 

Tags: , , , ,

Parution – Journal of Social History

 

Journal of Social History, Volume 44, Number 3, Spring 2011

Reading Baby Books: Medicine, Marketing, Money and the Lives of American Infants
Janet Golden, Lynn Weiner

« We Share a Sacred Secret »: Gender, Domesticity, and Containment in Transvestia’s Histories and Letters from Crossdressers and Their Wives
Robert Hill

Between Egyptian « National Purity » and « Local Flexibility »: Prostitution in al-Mahalla al-Kubra in the First Half of the 20th Century
Hanan Hammad

Textiles as Social Texts: Syphilis, Material Culture and Gender in Golden Age Spain
Cristian Berco

Education, Sex and Leisure: Ideology, Discipline and the Construction of Race Among South African Servicemen During the Second World War
Neil Roos

Who Were His Peers? The Social and Professional Milieu of the Provincial Surgeon-Apothecary in the Late-Eighteenth Century
Alannah Tomkins

 

Tags:

Séminaire – Philosophie et Immunologie


La prochaine séance du séminaire Philosophie & Immunologie aura lieu le 12 avril à 12h à l’IHPST :

Eric Vivier (CIML, Marseille),

« Immunité innée ou adaptative ? L’exemple des cellules NK »

Les cellules Natural killer (NK) ont été initialement définies comme lymphocytes effecteurs de l’immunité innée dotées de fonctions constitutives cytolytiques. Plus récemment, une vision plus nuancée des cellules NK a émergé. Les cellules NK sont maintenant reconnues comme exprimant un répertoire d’activation et de récepteurs inhibiteurs qui est étalonné pour assurer la tolérance au soi, tout en permettant l’efficacité contre les infections et le développement des tumeurs. En outre, les cellules NK ne réagissent pas de manière invariante mais s’adaptent à leur environnement. Enfin, des études récentes ont dévoilé que les cellules NK peuvent également monter une forme de mémoire immunologique spécifique de l’antigène. Ainsi, les cellules NK exercent des fonctions sophistiquées biologiques sophistiquées qui ont des attributs de l’immunité innée et adaptative, brouillant les frontières fonctionnelles entre ces deux branches
de la réponse immunitaire.

Lecture conseillée: Eric Vivier et al, Innate or Adaptive Immunity ? The Example of Natural Killer Cells, Science 331, 44 (2011).

Lieu : IHPST, Grande salle
13 rue du Four
2e étage
75006 Paris
(M°Mabillon ou Saint-Germain)

Détails sur le séminaire :
http://www-ihpst.univ-paris1.fr/s/24,philosophie_et_immunologie.html

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »